[SGVHAK] DSL Extreme Fusion

[Braddock]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I cut the Time Warner cord and went with DSL Extreme Fusion for voice
and data back in February.  I'm very happy with the service.

Note that with their Fusion service combined voice/data, you are
actually getting sonic.net DSL's network instead of DSL Extreme.  Only
annoyance there is that they block outbound port 25 and I think they
do some DNS redirect and filtering and they won't turn it off if you
are through sonic (they say they will if you were ACTUALLY on the DSL
Extreme network).

Downlink and uplink speeds are good for me considering it is DSL (I do
miss fast uplink from cable though).

As a cord cutter, I have absolutely no regrets about getting rid of
cable TV either.  Saves us a ton of money and I can find just about
anything I want to see and more on my Roku/Netflix/Hulu set up.

- -braddock


On 09/16/2013 05:20 PM, Claude Felizardo wrote:
> (Including the hacking mailing list as it got dropped when I
> replied to someone's email...)
> 
> Okay, this DSL Extreme fusion service with up to 20 Mbps download
> and phone service has caught my interest especially as I also
> receive a paper mail from AT&T saying they will be discontinuing
> DSL service in my area - they are really pushing Uverse.  I called
> DSL extreme and asked about the process and was told it would take
> 5-7 business days, it would be a self install with them shipping a
> new modem that I should receive a few days before the switch.  When
> I asked how they could provide faster speeds, I was told that I
> would be wired to a closer box, presumably one of those boxes I've
> been seeing through out the neighborhood but if I wanted regular
> DSL (~3 Mbps), then I'd be connected to different equipment further
> away leased from the AT&T which I'm guessing is the CO where I am
> currently connected to.
> 
> Anyone have any comments on DSL Extreme?  Service?  Reliability?
> Phone service?
> 
> I forgot to ask if I would have to disconnect my old modem at any
> point - I assume my old modem would continue to work and I won't
> see faster speeds until I swap in the new one?  Still haven't been
> able to determine what my upload speeds might be like.
> 
> Also, because I have such as old install, my splitter is in the
> demarc box and the self-install appears to include an in-house
> splitter.  Does anyone know if I can continue to use my old
> splitter or will I have to swap it as well?
> 
> Claude
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Claude Felizardo
> <cafelizardo at gmail.com <mailto:cafelizardo at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> thanks for the responses.
> 
> Sounds like I should avoid U-verse as originally planned.
> 
> Anyone have numbers for ATT business DSL?  pricing and speeds?
> 
> Anyone know what ports are blocked by TimeWarner cable?  As far as 
> I've noticed ATT has not been blocking ports but then again, I
> don't run my own mail server and I use non standard ports for
> things like HTTP/HTTPS, SSH, etc.  I've had the same static IP
> since 1999 but I can easily use my DynDNS account.  Does TWC's
> modem/router support pushing IP changes to dyndns?
> 
> I do not think Charter is in my area.  There's Adelphia or is it 
> Champion?  But again, I'm currently using TWC for digital cable
> TV.
> 
> Looks like I can get DSL Extreme Fusion as I'm connected to the 
> Arcadia CO.  Their website says they use ADSL2+ for a max 20 Mb
> down so the question is what's the upload speed?  From an old
> email, it looks like I am 5800' even though I am 5 blocks away.  I
> like the idea of $40/mo for a static IP 1-yr contract including
> unlimited nationwide telephone.  We're currently paying $30 to ATT
> just for the phone service with a few extra features which are part
> of DSL extremes standard service so this might save us in the
> neighborhood of $40?!!  Anyone have a referrer number?  Stan?
> 
> Original plan was to add cable internet, verify it works then
> cancel ATT DSL.  But if I switch DSL and phone service, I assume
> I'll be dark for a while?
> 
> Claude
> 
> 
> On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Rod Morison <rod at morison.biz 
> <mailto:rod at morison.biz>> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 9/12/2013 12:04 PM, John Kreznar wrote:
>>> In a posting purporting to be from Rod Morison
>>> <rod at morison.biz
> <mailto:rod at morison.biz>> but
>>> lacking a digital signature, it is written:
>> What's the point any more? Heh, have one, haven't plugged it in
> since wiping my tbird setup.
>> 
>> Yeah, you can run both. Not sure about port blocking as I moved
>> my
> mailserver to iweb and DNS to easydns years ago. I saved $s going 
> with residential service, no statics, but they have business
> service that has em.
>> 
>> RFC 4084? That would be a stretch for a residential provider.
>> Know
> any that do? Fwiw, here's their costumer 'legals' page: 
> http://www.charter.com/browse/content/services
>> 
>> How much? 30 - .01 for internet, 20 -.01 for phone. That's 49.98
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSN8NVAAoJEHWLR/DQzlZu7UkH/R2jX/EuQxAFqyz9nO9vocy2
W/kHXaBvT2UKScxQQRhC9JWMI3zum63A37QZKICVLCLqV21lCAqkckctGwc9PgHW
1OKqqGWDPcYkXQU/Bmb79zgvSb6W2Mk+drEjlWtGWc/GstSnzXVIWM7tqDHUKXDh
yq4uMha5J4HVYwmXXXFcYiUKj2A8Gb5cMo1ku2bSdxLrQA5umM4839i3qWhAQ3gD
WXMW09Ah9OobnQZA6QBX1B6KwbmS5Q5W3I0k7dEPX94ec3cdP9JEDKwaXwQZirNf
mZbu+id2L1ZDGGoZXApCHIH3ccckwEh5Rr0c46JT6iDv064qlVjO9PWiKr4cpn0=
=JMl0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----