[SGVHAK] Apr 7th HAK meeting

[nopbin at gmail.com]

Perhaps a helpful guide would be to know how many people plan to attend the
work meeting.

Personally I think an overriding consideration is what Dave as host wants
to do, which might be informed by how many people plan to come.

In general I don't see any problem with auxiliary activities that interest
members.  Though perhaps best if it doesn't infringe too often on its core
meetings since this groups consistency is one of its assets.

Kind of ironic that coming from one who doesn't attend consistently... :/
On Mar 30, 2016 8:50 AM, "Michael Starch" <starchmd at umich.edu> wrote:

> I think we should stick to our normal meet-up, and let people choose to go
> to the other if they would like.  Seeing as Hackaday's format is a
> show-and-tell and ours is work-on-projects, canceling our session in lieu
> of theirs would be a deviation from our groups' unspoken philosophy.
>
> -Michael
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Lan Dang via HAK <hak at sgvhak.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>>
>> Hackaday has a Meetup on Apr 7th at the new Design Lab.  They have lined up interesting speakers and they are still looking for more speaker or show and tell.  And they are providing food.
>>
>>
>> It conflicts with our usual HAK meet-up at Dave's workshop.  Should we update our Meetup to converge on thee Supply frame Design Lab?  Or should we just let people choose which Meetup to go to?
>>
>>
>> Hackaday Prize Talks: Quake-Catcher Network and Cryptocurrency
>>
>>
>> http://meetu.ps/e/BqDqp/df9DF/d
>>
>>
>>
>> Lan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sgvhak.net/pipermail/hak/attachments/20160331/dc849c4b/attachment.html>